Is there information indicating that the child/youth is or may be an Indian child/youth?
If yes, were tribal social workers or representatives included in the information-gathering and safety assessment process?
PERSON ALLEGED TO BE CAUSING HARM
Identify whether the person alleged to have caused the harm is a facility staff member (including but not limited to administration, volunteers, temporary staff), another child/youth at the facility, parent/guardian/Indian custodian/family of the child/youth, a third party, or unknown.
Note: If only “parent/guardian/Indian custodian/family” is selected, consider whether the safety assessment for caregivers would be more appropriate to complete.
FACTORS INFLUENCING CHILD/YOUTH VULNERABILITY
Conditions or child/youth characteristics that leave child/youth more susceptible to being harmed in these settings.
FACILITY FACTORS THAT MAY CONTRIBUTE TO CHILD/YOUTH VULNERABILITY
These conditions within the facility or their staff may impact child/youth’s ability to protect themselves or affect the facility’s ability to protect the child/youth.
FACILITY CAREGIVER CAUSED PHYSICAL HARM TO THE CHILD/YOUTH OR MADE A PLAUSIBLE THREAT TO CAUSE SERIOUS PHYSICAL HARM.
Facility caregiver took an action that caused one or more of the following or stated they intended to take an action that likely would cause one or more of the following.
FACILITY CAREGIVER’S EXPLANATION FOR AN INJURY TO THE CHILD/YOUTH IS QUESTIONABLE OR INCONSISTENT WITH THE TYPE OF INJURY, AND THE NATURE OF THE INJURY SUGGESTS THAT THE CHILD/YOUTH MAY BE IN IMMINENT DANGER OF SERIOUS HARM.
The child/youth has an injury that requires medical attention, and medical assessment indicates the injury is likely to be the result of abuse; OR has a suspicious injury that did not require medical treatment, but other information about the injury does not match with the explanation that the facility caregiver provided.
Note: Factors to consider include the child/youth’s age, location of injury, exceptional needs of the child/youth, and chronicity of injuries.
CHILD/YOUTH SEXUAL ABUSE IS SUSPECTED, AND CIRCUMSTANCES SUGGEST THAT THE CHILD/YOUTH MAY BE IN IMMINENT DANGER OF SERIOUS HARM.
Select this item if sexual abuse is occurring or is suspected of occurring and actions taken by facility are not adequately protecting that child/youth.
Sexual abuse is unwanted sexual activity involving applied force, threats, or manipulation.
Note: Select Item 4 when commercial sexual exploitation occurs or is suspected.
CHILD/YOUTH ABUSE THROUGH COMMERCIAL SEXUAL EXPLOITATION IS SUSPECTED, AND CIRCUMSTANCES SUGGEST THAT THE CHILD/YOUTH MAY BE IN IMMINENT DANGER OF SERIOUS HARM
Select this item if commercial sexual exploitation is occurring or is suspected of occurring and actions taken by facility are not adequately protecting that child/youth.
Children/youth aged 17 years old and younger are sexually exploited when they have engaged in or been forced to engage in sexual conduct or performance of sexual acts in return for a benefit, such as money, food, drugs, shelter, clothing, gifts, or other goods; or for financial or some other gain for a third party.
The sexual conduct may include any direct sexual contact or performing any acts, sexual or nonsexual, for the sexual gratification of others. These acts constitute sexual exploitation regardless of whether they are live, filmed, or photographed. Force, fraud, and coercion are not required to constitute commercial sexual exploitation.
Note: Children/youth may engage in this sexual conduct in an effort to meet unmet needs or as a means for survival. If actions taken by the facility are not adequately protecting the child/youth, select this item and consider whether any other safety threat may also be relevant in these situations.
FACILITY CAREGIVER ACTS TOWARD THE CHILD/YOUTH IN NEGATIVE WAYS THAT RESULT IN SEVERE PSYCHOLOGICAL/EMOTIONAL HARM.
Facility caregiver engages in a regular pattern of behavior that impairs the child/youth’s emotional development, self-worth, or self-confidence.
Examples of facility caregiver actions include the following:
FACILITY CAREGIVER DOES NOT MEET THE CHILD/YOUTH’S IMMEDIATE BASIC NEEDS, AND THIS RESULTS IN IMMINENT DANGER OF SERIOUS HARM.
The facility caregiver is unable or unwilling to address critical areas among the following, AND the child/youth has been seriously harmed or is in imminent danger of being seriously harmed as a result.
FACILITY PHYSICAL CONDITIONS ARE HAZARDOUS TO THE POINT OF IMMINENT DANGER OF SERIOUS HARM TO THE CHILD/YOUTH.
Facility conditions are causing or have the potential to cause imminent serious harm to child/youth’s health or safety.
Consider situations including but not limited to the following.
Note: Physical conditions may be suboptimal, or the CWS investigator may have reason to believe they do not meet California licensing standards. If so, contact licensing. This item should be selected only if the “imminent danger” threshold is reached
FACILITY CAREGIVER DOES NOT PROTECT THE CHILD/YOUTH FROM SERIOUS HARM BY PEERS.
The facility caregiver does not or cannot protect the child/youth from threatened or actual serious physical or emotional harm by other children/youth. Consider the age and developmental stage of the child/youth and impact on them from the other child/youth’s action.
Examples include but are not limited to the following.
FACILITY CAREGIVER DOES NOT PROTECT THE CHILD/YOUTH FROM SERIOUS HARM BY OTHER ADULTS.
The facility caregiver does not or cannot protect the child/youth from serious physical harm, emotional harm, or threatened harm by other adults, including family members or other adults who have regular access to the child/youth.
Examples include but are not limited to the following.
Note: If an adult harms a child/youth after they have run away, consider (1) if the child/youth already had regular access to this adult that the facility caregiver was aware of and/or (2) if safety threat 10 is more applicable.
FACILITY CAREGIVER DOES NOT RESPOND TO AND ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING CHILD/YOUTH ACTIONS, AND THIS RESULTS IN IMMINENT DANGER OF SERIOUS HARM.
The facility caregiver cannot or does not take action in order to protect the child/youth when a child/youth demonstrates behavior that can cause them serious harm, OR the facility caregiver takes actions that worsen the situation when a child/youth falls victim to behavior that can cause themself serious harm.
This includes but is not limited to situations where the facility caregiver is unable or unwilling to respond to the following child/youth actions.
Note: If facility caregiver does not seek needed medical or mental health care after a child/youth engages in behavior that can cause them serious harm, select this item AND consider safety threat 5.
OTHER SAFETY THREAT (DESCRIBE)
Circumstances or conditions pose an imminent threat of serious harm to the child/youth that are not already described in safety threats 1–10.
PROTECTIVE CAPACITIES (CHILD/YOUTH)
Child/youth acknowledges the safety threat.
The child/youth can clearly describe and demonstrates an understanding of the issues that led to the current safety threat.
Child/youth is willing and able to participate in a safety plan.
The child/youth has agreed to participate in a plan to imminently address the safety threat AND has the physical and emotional capacity to participate in that plan.
Child/youth has shown in the past that they can take action to protect themself.
The child/youth has demonstrated an ability to take steps to protect themself from harm in the past (e.g., reporting safety concerns to a safe adult, leaving an unsafe situation, asking for help).
Child/youth reports having a trusting relationship with at least one facility staff member.
The child/youth has at least one supportive relationship with someone at the facility whom they confide in.
Child/youth reports having a trusting relationship with at least one family member or support network member, AND they are willing to share the details of the safety threat with them.
The child/youth has at least one supportive relationship with a family member or support network member, AND they are they are willing to disclose at least some details of the threat to that person.
Other (describe)
The child/youth demonstrates other actions and/or coping skills or accesses resources that may help them respond to the safety threat.
PROTECTIVE CAPACITIES (FACILITY)
Facility staff and leadership acknowledge the safety threat.
Facility leadership AND at least one other facility caregiver who has day-to-day responsibility for the child/youth can clearly describe and demonstrates an understanding of the issues that led to the current safety threat.
Facility staff shared details of the safety threat with all relevant members of the Child and Family Team, including any tribal social worker.
A facility caregiver has described the concerns and actions that led to the safety threat to child/youth’s family, tribal social worker, and lawyer, as well as to any other key members of their Child and Family Team.
Facility leadership and staff are willing and able to participate in a safety plan.
Facility leadership AND at least one facility caregiver who has day-to-day responsibility for the child/youth have agreed to participate in a plan to immediately address the safety threat, AND facility leadership is willing to commit the staff and resources to that plan.
Other (describe)
The facility demonstrates other actions, is accessing resources, and/or is making responses to the concerns that allow them to immediately respond to the safety threat.
PROTECTIVE INTERVENTIONS
Intervention or direct services provided by a CWS worker (do not include fact-finding actions from the investigation itself).
Actions that the investigating worker or other CWS staff take or plan that specifically address one or more safety threats.
Examples include providing information about expected facility actions in response to a child/youth being AWOL or to signs of exploitation, providing information about child/youth development needs, or planning return visits to the facility to check on progress. Does not include the fact-finding activities of the investigation itself or services provided to respond to child/youth needs that do not directly respond to the indicated safety threats.
Use of Child and Family Team members, support network, and/or community agencies as participants on the safety plan.
Family, extended family, or support networks have actionable items on the safety plan.
Examples include but are not limited to the family agreeing to regularly visit the child/youth at the facility, or a close family friend agreeing to regularly meet with the child/youth and ask about the events that led to the safety threat to ensure the safety threat is no longer present. Action steps should include a backup plan of what steps participants will take if the threat is present and not being controlled for.
Use of resources and/or recommendations from tribal representatives as part of the safety plan.
A tribe(s), Indian community, Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) program, or other tribal resource has actionable items on the safety plan.
Examples include regular visits from a tribal social worker or representative of that tribe or from a staff member at a community-based agency who is aware of the safety threat and is willing to ask about it to ensure it is no longer happening.
Other tribal resources include but are not limited to:
Alleged perpetrator has been arrested, fired, or suspended from facility. (This cannot be the only item on the safety plan.)
Facility leadership has fired, suspended, or removed a facility caregiver who is an alleged perpetrator; and the alleged perpetrator no longer has access to child/youth.
Note: Consider facility plan to ensure the alleged perpetrator does not have access to the child/youth, such as removing their keys, informing CCL, etc. If a facility has taken this action and the final determination of the assessment is “safe with plan,” the safety plan must include other action items in addition to the termination or suspension of the staff.
Examples of other action items include what the child/youth will do if they become triggered by a similar event and what the facility will do to ensure the fired or suspended staff will not have access to the child/youth in the community.
Facility will change staffing levels to address the safety threat.
Facility leadership has added new staff or shifted staff to support the child/youth in a manner that directly responds to the safety threat
Facility will change behavior plan/response to child/youth.
Facility staff have made significant changes to the behavior plan and have new strategies for responding to the child/youth that will directly respond to the safety threat.
Facility will change location of child/youth within the facility and/or separate them from particular peers.
Facility leadership has moved the child/youth or a peer to new part of the facility in a way that will directly respond to the safety threat.
Other
CWS, the child/youth, tribe (if applicable), their family or support network, and/or facility caregivers will take other actions that immediately respond to the safety threat in a manner not captured in the above interventions.
Placement change
One or more safety threats are present. All interventions above have been considered, and none of them will address the safety threat. A placement change is the only intervention possible to address the safety threat for the child/youth. Without the placement change, the child/youth will remain in imminent danger of serious harm. Note: Parents, legal caregivers, and children/youth’s legal representatives must be contacted if a placement change is being made. Additionally, if there is reason to know that the child/youth is an Indian child/youth and a placement change is to be made, the affiliated tribe(s) must be contacted.
County CWS that is responsible for child/youth will transfer the child/youth to a new placement immediately.
The county child welfare or probation office that is responsible for the child/youth’s care will take steps to move the child/youth to a new placement immediately.
Note: If a transfer is not possible immediately, a safety plan must be initiated that controls for the threat while a new placement is sought.
TRIBAL AGREEMENT WITH FINAL SAFETY DECISION
Complete only if the child/youth is or may be an Indian child/youth.
Is the tribe(s) in agreement with the final safety decision?
If it has been indicated that the child/youth may be an Indian child/youth and contact with the tribe(s) has been made, review the safety decision collaboratively with the tribe(s). While agreement with the decision is not required, document efforts to gain agreement and the tribe’s position on the final safety decision.
Facility leadership and staff are willing and able to participate in a safety plan.
Facility leadership AND at least one facility caregiver who has day-to-day responsibility for the child/youth have agreed to participate in a plan to immediately address the safety threat, AND facility leadership is willing to commit the staff and resources to that plan.
DURING THE COURSE OF THIS SAFETY ASSESSMENT, WERE OTHER CHILDREN/YOUTH IDENTIFIED AT THE FACILITY WHO MAY HAVE BEEN ABUSED OR NEGLECTED?
If in the course of this safety assessment the CWS staff became aware of other children/youth who are suspected to have been abused or neglected, call the child abuse hotline for the county that placed the child/youth in this facility.
IS LICENSING AWARE OF THE CURRENT INVESTIGATION?
Determine whether a report to licensing has been made; if not, file report.
IS A REPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT REQUIRED?
Determine whether a report to law enforcement is required.
SAFETY DECISION
Safe
No safety threats were identified at this time. Based on currently available information, child/youth is not in imminent danger of serious harm. CWS staff should complete the investigation and partner with other counties, tribe(s), and CCL as needed. Complete Section 6; then, this assessment is complete.
Safe with plan
One or more safety threats are present; however, the child/youth can safely remain in the facility with a safety plan. Protective interventions have been initiated through a safety plan that CWS, the facility, and the child/youth will be a part of. The child/youth will remain in the facility as long as the interventions continue to mitigate the safety threats. Complete a formal safety plan with intervention details and share it with the facility caregivers, facility leadership, CCL, child/youth, tribe (if applicable), and child/youth’s family/legal guardian.
Note: If a safety plan is implemented, a Child and Family Team Meeting (CFTM) should be convened, and a new safety assessment should be completed within 30 days.
Unsafe
One or more safety threats are present. All interventions above have been considered, and none of them will address the safety threat. A placement change is the only intervention possible to address the safety threat for the child/youth. Without the placement change, the child/youth will remain in imminent danger of serious harm.
Note: Parents, legal caregivers, and children/youth’s legal representatives must be contacted if a placement change is being made. Additionally, if there is reason to know that the child/youth is an Indian child/youth and a placement change is to be made, the affiliated tribe(s) must be contacted.